• Obtained summary judgment in favor of an insurer that its personal auto policy’s “Regular Use” exclusion barred coverage for a lawsuit against its named insured for bodily injury caused while driving his wife’s separately insured vehicle.
• Obtained summary judgment in favor of an insurer that it owed no duty to defend its insured for an alleged “personal and advertising injury” based upon the policy’s “Knowledge of Falsity” exclusion, and judgment that the insurer was entitled to reimbursement of defense fees exceeding $1 million.
• Obtained summary judgment that an insurer’s policy language was unambiguous, and that the insurer owed no coverage to its insured based upon an exclusion titled “Radioactive Matter Exclusion” that barred coverage for bodily injury arising out of exposure to any radioactive matter or “any form of radiation”, where an underlying lawsuit alleged bodily injury caused by electromagnetic field radiation.
• Obtained judgment on the pleadings in favor of insurer that an assault and battery exclusion applied to preclude coverage for an underlying lawsuit.
• Obtained summary judgment in favor of insurer that claimant was resident of insured premises, so “residence” exclusion applied to preclude coverage.
• Successfully represented insurer in coverage dispute before the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals regarding the application of the Contractual Liability and Employer's Liability exclusions in a CGL policy.
• Obtained judgment on the pleadings that an entity seeking coverage did not qualify as an additional insured.
• Successfully represented insurer before the Illinois First District Court of Appeals regarding an insured's claim that the insurer had waived certain coverage defenses.